In response to Clif High.
The discernment is within me. I can see how you believe in this man’s Tetrahedron, when the Arch is the way to go.
The arch is analogue tensor strength. The tetrahedron is digital geodesic math for graphic cards.
And besides. Where is your great example of functional BuckMinster Fuller architecture IRL? The damn Epcot Center? That’s all you got.
The arch is it. Not tetrahedron construction.
The arch is human. The tetrahedron is for robots.
Buckminster Fuller is full of shit.
Let’s get on with the war, already.
To send a tip to the author, please login.